Can I prove it? - Can you understand it?

I can prove it, but are you able to understand it?
I think that the last problem is much more difficult to solve.
Of course I cannot make a picture of it.
That would be really nice and easy.
Unfortunately my proving is by thinking, by logic in a unity with the given reality.
But many things in science cannot be proven by pictures or experiments, what scientists want us to believe, for instance the evolution theory cannot be proven by pictures or experiments.
You cannot put the whole evolution in a test-tube.
It is based on logical thinking.
It is reasonable that it has been that way.
There are many ways things can be proven and also many ways not to accept them if you don't want.
You still might believe that God has created the world in seven days.
Whole books could be written about the subject of prove, and you can always accept the most ridicule things by saying: "You never can tell!",

or reject the most certain things by saying: "It might be different!"

There is no absolute certainty and even that is not certain. -
But anyway: I hope that you are able to give me at least the benefit of the doubt, because:

- one reason -

1 - Our universe cannot come from Nothing according to the theory of the Big Bang.
From Nothing comes Nothing, the old philosophers already knew.
Science might be wrong in this respect.
You can get a cent from a pound, but you cannot get a pound from a cent.
It is just as simple as that.
Even a child can understand this.

- another reason. -

2 - How can life come from dead matter?
And science cannot explain how simple and stupid atoms are able to organize a whole evolution of all kinds of living beings and also:
"How does these atoms know their way in our bodies so well?" , I read in a book of science.
Indeed: some scientist admits that there is something missing here!!!
These atoms must be very intelligent.
But they don't look so intelligent, do they?
The form of the atom is too simple to reflect a high intelligence, but if they were spaceships the whole problem would be solved, and the universe would reflect a logical system!

- and the third reason. -

3 - The microcosm is a higher world, according to the higher physics of the atoms and nuclear power and special laws of the electromagnetic field and quantum physics and also the string theory, and so on, and so on.
- But what is a higher world?? -
A higher world is a spacecraft culture, because in the future we shall build the macrocosm into a spacecraft culture too as a repeating of the microcosm into the macrocosm, and the universe will become transparent and comprehensible.

An eternal evolution.

For instance: "my" evolution is an eternal evolution and not the unhappy evolution of modern science in which the universe will collapse finally and we have to start all over again.

- That's totally useless. -

And life has not arisen by some coincidence from dead matter, but life itself is the basis of existence of the universe in the first place in all eternity.
What stupid universe would that be that would only be a mechanical structure with life as only coincidence: what a waste of creation!?
(I also heard Barbara Streisand say this in a movie.)

Life as a coincidence or as a necessity?

These are already three very big reasons and the third reason with some extra big explanations towards a positive, useful evolution and also a universe extreme full of life instead of dead things in which life itself is not more than just coincidence instead of necessity. -
I could tell you even more reasons, but I think this is more than enough for this moment.

atoms are spaceships
quarks

When I say: atoms are spaceships, then I mean that the parts of the atoms are spaceships.
Not so that the whole atom is one big simple spaceship of course.
Atoms are built up from spaceships, because the atom is made up from a nucleus and electrons around that nucleus and that nucleus is built up from protons and neutrons and these parts are built up from quarks.
And it might be that even these quarks are not the smallest parts, according to the string theory.
So I cannot tell you how it looks "down there beyond" exactly.
I have never been there.
(As far as I can remember, because in an eternal life everyone must have been a micro-being too.
And there is infinite more chance to live like a micro-being than to live like a human being, because there are infinite more of them.)

Everyone in his own spaceship.

Anyway: I think that is very complex there from the biggest to the smallest spaceships in all kind of shapes, but it is also possible that the "string spaceships" are already spaceships of the even much smaller mini-microcosm.
There is much to speculate and to fantasize too about the microcosm according to my atomic theory.
Maybe every micro-being has his own spaceship, like we all want to have our own car.
(Even if we suffocate in our own exhaust gases.)

waves or particles ?

And many spaceships from the mini-microcosm, maybe even quintillions of them, could form waves in the microcosm, light waves, from which could emerge bigger complexities as light particles.
It would solve the problem whether light is built up from waves or particles.

The big bang.

A special problem is the so called big bang, because if the universe is really eternal according to my atomic theory, what about the conviction of scientists that the universe has begun with a very big bang about 15 milliard years ago?
I'll try to explain this problem to you, because the solution is very easy:
our running of time is very slow compared with the running of time in the microcosm.
And this is very easy to see if you know that the electron turns around the nucleus of the atom about 10,000,000,000,000,000 times in a second.
Let's say that one such a turning around is about a year for the micro-beings, compared with one turning of the earth around the sun.

time calculation

(I use the British also Dutch counting numbers)

Then it is easy to calculate that the time in the microcosm is about a quadrillion as quick as our time.
(because there are about 30,000,000 seconds in a year and 30,000,000 x 10,000,000,000,000,000 = about a quadrillion)
But the exact calculation is not so important of course, it is enough to see that time in the microcosm is much, much, much more quicker* than our time and that our 15 milliards years since the big bang are much longer for the micro-beings.
For them it is about: 10,000 quintillions of years. (=10³⁴)
And for the minimicrobeings it is about: 10,000 nonillion of years. (=10⁵⁸)
And for the maxi-minimicrobeings it is about: 10,000 tredecillion of years. (=10⁸²)
And for the super-maximinimicrobeings it is about: 10,000 septendecilllion of years. (=10¹⁰⁶)
And so on, and so on, and so on, without any limit.
And that means that our 15 milliards of years is in fact and in essence an inward eternal time.
* And so is the time in the macrocosm much, much more slower than our time.
Because the milky way needs 200 million years to make one turn around.
If we compare this with one year around the sun of our planet, the macrocosm is only 75 years old since the "beginning" of the big bang !!

there was never a beginning.

How odd and paradoxical it might seem: there was never a beginning!
It just looks that way for us in our very slow time running.
Because in the first second of the big bang our time didn't exist, but only the time of the micro-beings and this one second for us was about: 10,000 billion years for them.
And in the first second of this 10,000 billions of years the time of the micro-beings didn't exist either and there was only the time of the minimicrobeings and for them that second was a very, very long time, and so on, and so on, and so on.
So: the beginning of the universe, according to the big bang theory is unreachable.
There was never a beginning.
The universe is eternal.

The universe as a clock-work.

You could compare the universe with a clock in which the bigger wheels of the clock-work go very slow and the little ones go quick and the even smaller ones go even quicker and quicker, and so on, and so on.
The moving of many little wheels make the bigger wheels go round and vice versa.

The next item will be:

how did I found my atomic theory??

click here for frame
(if you entered without any)

main index