|
| DG (Full price) (CD) 415 107-2GH (CD) 415
108-2GH (two discs, oas). |
|
|
| No. 4Selected comparison |
|
|
| Philh, Ashkenazy (3/83) 400 056-2DH |
|
|
| No. 5Selected comparison |
|
|
| Philh, Ashkenazy (8/83) 410 016-2DH. |
|
|
| Philh, Rattle (4/84) CDC7 47006-2 |
|
|
| No. 6Selected comparison |
|
|
| Gothenburg SO, Jarvi (10/84) CD237 |
|
|
| No. 7Selected comparison |
|
|
| Philh, Ashkenazy (10/84) 411 935-2DH |
|
A glance at the current Gramophone Compact
Disc Guide and Catalogue will show that the Sibelius symphonies are already well
served in the new format but these new DG transfers are astonishingly fine, and can really
hold their own with all comers. The Fifth Symphony faces the greatest competition (and
formidable it is too) from Ashkenazy and the Philharmonia Orchestra on Decca, not to
mention the even finer account Simon Rattle has made with the same orchestra for EMI. Both
versions have the advantage of the latest engineering: yet the excellence of this classic
Karajan record is such that few listeners would guess its age. The Karajan is (to quote IM
who reviewed its last reissue on cassette) "a great performance" and, to my
mind, it is indisputably the finest of the four LP versions he has made (two with the
Philharmonia for Columbia and the 1977 Berlin account for HMV). Impressive though it is, I
have never thought Karajan's Seventh quite in the same class, and it must yield both
technically and, I think, artistically to the Ashkenazy which is very powerful and coupled
with impressive Tapiola. However, the virtues of the Fifth are well known and I cannot
welcome its appearance in the CD format too warmly.
The Ashkenzay/Philharmonia account of the Fourth
Symphony has spectacular range and impact but the nearly 20-year-old Karajan recording is
only marginally less powerful and the performance is of real stature. It has grown in my
estimation over the years and I find that having felt it too well-groomed on first
acquaintance in the mid-1960s, I have come to discover its depths in later years. Although
one is bowled over by the Ashkenazy at first, it is the Karajan that has the greater
concentration and tension. Of course, couplings are relevant: the Ashkenazy on Decca
offers Finlandia and Luonnotar, with Elisabeth Soderstrom (having more
vibrato than is ideally desirable), while the DG offers Karajan's glorious account of the
Sixth Symphony, which to my mind remains almost unsurpassed. Among its predecessors only
the famous Beecham recording on LP (RCAnla) offers more distinctive
insightsand I endorse a recent plea in these columns for its reissue (see April
Correspondence, page 1172), and of more recent versions Sir Colin Davis's LP account on
Philips with the Boston orchestra is extremely fine. (A concert performance I heard at the
Royal Festival Hall last summer from Ashkenazy and the Philharmonia promises well.)
However, so far as a CD is concerned, at the time of writing the only contender of note is
Neeme Jarvi and the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra who give a vividly-recorded account with
totally committed playing on BIS/Conifer. In its CD format this is coupled with Pelleas
et Melisande. Although Karajan's recording does not quite have the range of the Jarvi
version, the situation is now much improved and the performance is a great one: so are
Nos. 4 and 5.
RL