|
| Decca digital (Mid price) (LP) 417
378-1DM5 (five records, nas); (Cassette) 417 378-4DM4 Booklet included. |
|
So far, there hasn't been a set of Sibelius
symphonies that one could happily recommend over all. Maazel (Decca), Davis (Philips) and
Karajan's DG collection (Symphonies Nos. 4-7) each include some fine performances, but
none of them quite manages to convince as a cycle. The Ashkenazy set does just that: not
only are the performances remarkably consistent in quality; on top of that Ashkenazy
conveys a profound awareness of the processes that underlie Sibelius's development as a
symphonist. As the composer leaves behind him the frankly rhetorical gestures of the
finale of Symphony No. 1 and the Andante of No. 2 and concentrates more on what he
called "the profound logic" of "inner connection", so Ashkenazy's
manner becomes less indulgent, and there are signs of an increasing concern for the pacing
of musical events. In the slow movement of No. 4 for instance, Ashkenazy's sense of timing
is most impressive: pauses between gestures are judged to a nicety, so that the silences
are long enough to be pregnant, but not so long as to allow dissipation of energy. In
general Ashkenazy's initial choice and subsequent manipulation of tempo are almost
unerringly perceptive. Only once, in the finale of No. 6, does his change of pulse sound
forced (I'm referring to the difficult gradual acceleration just before letter L).
Elsewhere there's an irresistible sense of current, sometimes immensely slow, sometimes
precipitously fast.
So far, so good; but there's more to Sibelius
than formal processes, fundamental though these may be to the musical language; there's
that uniquely Sibelian sound-world, so powerfully evocative of the atmosphere and imagery
of Nordic mythology, of vast Northern land and skyscapes and the stirrings of elemental
forces; and there's the simple matter of expressionthe music may surge like the
mightiest of rivers, but does it speak? In these respects I find Ashkenazy rather less
convincing. The playing of the Philharmonia Orchestra is polished and obviously attentive
throughout, and the recordings manage to be immediate without upsetting overall balance or
allowing intrusive noise, but the end product has a glossy qualityit's as though one
had experienced the musical landscape via a magnificently filmed travelogue rather than at
first hand. As for expression, Ashkenazy may have a fine sense of the overall shape of
each movement, each paragraph, even each phrase, but when it comes to the tiny inflexions
that give a phrase or figure its poignancy, which make it 'tell'here something is
definitely lacking. Ashkenazy has succeeded in communicating his understanding of the
grand design of each work to the players, but not so much, it seems, his feelings about
expressive elements. Thus his interpretations may impress, even grip the listener, but
they are rarely affecting. A pity, for the insights are there; too frequently in
fact for such a set to be easily dismissed. On balance, these performances should be heard
by anyone who really cares about Sibelius: there's plenty to be learned from such acute
and penetrating readings. Whether you will want to live with them though is another
matter.
SJ