|
| Virgin Veritas (Full price) (CD) VC7 91515-2 (74
minutes: DDD). |
|
|
| Sony Classical Vivarte (Full price) (CD) CD48132
(71 minutes: DDD). |
|
|
| [Symphony] Symphonies [No.] Nos. 5 and
8selected comparisons: |
|
|
| LCP, Norrington (12/90) CDC7 49968-2 |
|
|
| ASMF, Marriner (2/91) 432 045-2PM |
|
|
| Symphony No. 9selected comparison: |
|
|
| LCP, Norrington (4/90) CDC7 49949-2 |
|
With period-instrument versions of Schubert
symphonies on disc fast becoming the norm rather than the exception, the fact that this
review will probably not mention a single name from generations of 'traditional'
interpreters should not be taken to imply that your reviewer regards them as yesterday's
men, far from it. Maybe in a decade we will be thinking of supplementing an 'authentic'
performance with a modern-instrument one, but for the moment it is still the other way
around.
Frivolous and provocative digressions aside, on
initial acquaintance, Mackerras, with more conventional (slower) tempos in both the Fifth
and Eighth Symphonies, seems less intent on challenging tradition than Norrington (EMI).
The Fifth here is certainly a good deal more genial, carefree, and closer to the sunny
Schubert Fifth we have always known and loved. From the opening bars, Mackerras's
orchestra sounds more comfortable with the slower pace, whereas Norrington's urgency puts
an obvious strain on his players. I have lived with Norrington's Fifth for over two years
now, and try as I may, I cannot help feeling that a touch of moderation in this first
movement would have helped his cause, for, elsewhere, there is no doubt in my mind that
his is the more consistently stimulating interpretation; that is, if you want your
Schubert Fifth given a darker, more nervous, almost Sturm und Drang treatment.
Plausible? Yes, I think so. Was Schubert, for example, just having fun when he wrote the
agitated ff 'episode' that precedes the finale's second subject? Is it just a storm
in a teacup? EMI's Abbey Road No. 1 Studio was the location for both recordings, and of
the two, the Virgin sound catches a brighter edge to the instruments, with a little more
space around the orchestra.
That extra space affords greater mystery to the
cellos and basses at the start of Mackerras's Unfinished, and the violins' ensuing
semiquavers are sul ponticello to chilling effect. In this movement Mackerras hits
harder than Norrington; the anguished howls after the second subject's song breaks off are
from the heart; the jabbing dotted wind figure in the development (from 8'06")
threatens the main theme more fiercely. The manner is grander, more rhetorical. I have my
doubts, though, about his 'slow' tempo (compared to Norrington and Bruno Weil) for the
second movement, given his orchestra's vibrato-less string playing, and his decision to
lean on accents with a longer diminuendo than Norrington's shorter, sharper
emphases; the result struck me on more than one occasion as inexpressive and heavy.
However, Mackerras's disc has one very positive
advantage over Norrington's: he may not include every last repeat in the Fifth Symphony,
as does Norrington, but his disc finds room for the Eighth's Scherzo
orchestratedand in the case of its Trio, virtually composedby Brian Newbould;
and the B minor Entr'acte from Rosamunde, which Schubert may have originally
written as the finale of the symphony. And, despite reservations, Mackerras offers a more
convincing 'finished' Eighth than Marriner (Philips), largely because the latter is
comparatively wooden in the first two movements. The "delicious" (Tovey's
description) Ballet Music in G completes a generously filled disc.
Bruno Weil's Unfinished is surely too
relentless. That the eventual F sharp of the opening is not held for its full length is an
early indication of nervy podium hustling. There is not the faintest hint of slackening
for the transition to the second subject (horns and bassoons at 1'00"), and little
more for any other of the transitions in either symphony for that matter; and the first
movement's final chord is almost brutal (no diminuendo). Weil writes in the
accompanying booklet of the "questionable accents and sforzati that strain the
clarity of articulation". Well, I don't sense clarity of articulation to be strained
in the slightest degree in Norrington's second movement. Indeed, those accents, for me,
add an extra imaginative dimension. Weil's tempo for this Andante is almost
identical to Norrington's, yet, unlike Norrington's, it feels rigidly maintained (no
slowing for the coda). Neither is The Classical Band (formed in 1989 from New York's
"finest period-instrument players") as recorded here, possessed of such full
toned strings as the London Classical Players; the bass line is often weak, and the
trumpets over-assertive.
But this disc, too, offers more Schubert than the
comparative EMI issues, and the Great C major finds Weil in a more accommodating
mood. With its lighter, airy textures, much of it falls more easily on the ear than
Norrington's. The Scherzo is almost gentle, less bold of timbre and gesture. That
is indeed welcome after the crisis at the centre of the slow movement, where Weil's
ferocious brass fanfares would seem to portend some universal apocalypse (and mask
woodwind detail). They (the brass) have been held in check until this moment; rather
effectively, I thought, at the end of the first movement, allowing the woodwind the lions'
share of the opening theme. Though his speeds are broadly similar to Norrington's, Weil
uses a greater variety of temposthe introduction is slightly slower than the first allegro,
which is fine; the increase in pace for the finale's second subject is not so
convincingbut he is still less flexible than Norrington within a given pace; and
responds less imaginatively to the work's dynamic extremes (the start of the finale's coda
is not really ppp). There are no first movement and finale repeats.
JS