|
| Double Decca (Mid price) (CD) 444 839-2DF2
(two discs: 135 minutes: ADD). From SXLF6565/7 (9/72). |
|
|
| Concerto No. 2 selected comparison: |
|
|
| Richter, Warsaw Nat PO, Wislocki (6/85) (DG) 415
119-2GH |
|
|
| Concerto No. 3 selected comparison: |
|
|
| Gilels, Paris Cons, Cluytens (2/94) (TEST)
SBT1029 |
|
|
| Concerto No. 4 selected comparison: |
|
|
| Michelangeli, Philh, Gracis (9/88) (EMI) CDC7
49326-2 |
|
Vladimir Ashkenazys recorded partnerships
with Kondrashin, Previn, Haitink, Ormandy and, as conductor, with Jean-Yves Thibaudet,
testify to his enduring affection for the Rachmaninov concertos. This present reissue with
Previn and the LSO dates from 1972 yet the sound and balance are superb and there is
nothing to cloud or impede ones sense of Ashkenazys greatness in all these
works. Few performances erase, in such a serene and magisterial way, loose chatter about
pre-Hollywood emotionalism or an estimate, in a mercifully past edition of Grove,
of a composer too cosmopolitan to achieve lasting value. From Ashkenazy every
page declares Rachmaninovs nationality, his indelibly Russian nature. What nobility
of feeling and what dark regions of the imagination he relishes and explores in page after
page of the Third Concerto in particular. Significantly his opening is a very moderate Allegro
ma non tanto, later allowing him an expansiveness and imaginative scope hard to find
in other more driven or hectic performances. His rubato, his sense of the
musics emotional ebb and flow, is as natural as it is distinctive and his way of
easing from one idea to another (the first movement Allegro Tempo precedent ma
un poco piu mosso) shows him at his most intimately and romantically responsive. There
are no cuts, and his choice of the bigger of the two cadenzas is entirely apt, given the
breadth of his conception. Even the skittering figurations and volleys of repeated notes
just before the close of the central Intermezzo cannot tempt Ashkenazy into display
and he is quicker than any other pianist to find a touch of wistfulness beneath
Rachmaninovs occasional outer playfulness (the scherzando episode in the
finale).
Such imaginative fervour and delicacy are just as
central to Ashkenazys other performances. His steep unmarked decrescendo at
the close of the First Concertos opening rhetorical gesture is symptomatic of his
romantic bias, his love of the musics interior glow. And despite his prodigious
command in, say, the final pages of both the First and Fourth Concertos, there is never a
hint of bombast or a more superficial brand of fire-and-brimstone virtuosity.
Previn works hand in glove with his soloist.
Clearly, this is no one-night partnership but the product of the greatest musical
sympathy, of a mutual skill and affection. The opening of the Third Concertos Intermezzo
(where the orchestra momentarily step into the limelight) could hardly be given with a
more idiomatic, brooding melancholy, a perfect introduction for all that is to follow.
Naturally, you will have your own favourite individual performances (mine include Richter
in the First Chant du Monde, 10/90, nla and Second Concertos, Gilels in the
Third and Michelangeli in the Fourth) but I have to say that if you want to hear playing
which captures Rachmaninovs always elusive, opalescent centre then Ashkenazy is hard
to beat. No more personal or deeply felt performances exist.
BM