|
| Virgin Classics (Full price) (LP) VC7 90702-1;
(Cassette) VC7 90702-4; (CD) VC7 90702-2 (69 minutes: DDD). |
|
|
| [No.] Nos. 32 and 35 - selected comparison: |
|
|
| ECO, Tate (5/85) (EMI) (LP) EL270253-1 |
|
|
| ECO, Tate (9/86) (EMI) (CD) CDC7 47327-2 |
|
|
| No. 36 - selected comparison: |
|
|
| ECO, Tate (1/86) (EMI) (LP) EL270306-1 |
|
|
| ECO, Tate (11/86) (EMI) (CD) CDC7 47442-2 |
|
This is Jukka-Pekka Saraste's debut on disc with
the orchestra of which he is Principal Conductor, the Scottish Chamber Orchestra, and very
impressive it is. In much-recorded Mozart the test could hardly be more severe, and it is
Saraste's achievement to draw from his players fresh, alert performances, strong as well
as elegant, which more than the direct rivals on modern instruments reflect the new
lessons of period performance. So taking the outstanding EMI versions of Jeffrey Tate and
the ECO as a yardstick, Saraste's readings of all three symphonies have a less sostenuto
style, with string articulation a degree lighter, violin tone on the thin side, and with
beefy horn tone cutting through textures more sharply. With the recording acoustic fairly
reverberant, there is no smallness of scale implied, and the textures remain commendably
transparent; woodwind lines are audible even when doubling with strings. Speeds are
generally a degree faster than with Tate, and in such a movement as the Andante of
the Haffner I certainly prefer Saraste's lighter, more detached style at a more
flowing tempo.
He is also much more generous with repeats, even
following the line that Christopher Hogwood adopted in the AAM period performances for
L'Oiseau-Lyre in observing repeats in the da capos of minuets. Following the
current trend Saraste introduces an exposition repeat in the first movement of the Haffner
though the score does not mark one, presumabiy on the principle that the earlier Serenade
version did have one, and a symphony should not fall short. Certainly it helps to balance
the movements better but not everyone will welcome the second half repeat of the final Presto
in the Linz, which then becomesif only by half a minutethe longest of
the four movements. In that movement I began by preferring Tate's lustier, and for once
faster, reading but the freshness and lightness of Saraste won me over, ending with a
particularly effective rendering of the final coda, allowing just the right easing on the
last emphatic unison in dotted rhythm to convey finality. The rivalry with Tate is not
direct. The latter's EMI disc has No. 39 coupled with Nos. 32 and 35, while he couples the
Linz with the Prague. But I shall certainly not object if Saraste expands
this into a series for Virgin, even at a time when Mozart symphonies are coming in
embarrassing profusion.
EG