| 1996 October 1996 Orchestral Lutoslawski Symphony No. 4. Partita. Interlude. Chain 2. Funeral Music. |
Lutoslawski Symphony No. 4. Partita a. Interlude. Chain 2 a. Funeral Music. a Krzysztof Bakowski (vn); Polish National Radio Symphony Orchestra / Antoni Wit. |
||||
Naxos (Super budget price) (CD) 8 553202 (77 minutes: DDD). |
||||
| Symphony No. 4 comparative version: | ||||
| Los Angeles PO, Salonen (11/94) (SONY) SK66280 | ||||
| Partita/Chain 2 selected comparison: | ||||
| Mutter, Moll, BBC SO, Lutoslawski (2/89) (DG) 423 696-2GH | ||||
Naxoss super-bargain price foray into the contemporary repertory is all the more commendable for managing to include Lutoslawskis finest late work, the Symphony No. 4 (1992). The disc demonstrates the enormous distance the composer travelled from the rather dry symmetries of Funeral Music (1958) to the symphonys beautifully balanced dialogue between lyricism and drama: and it also includes the first recording of the Interlude which Lutoslawski wrote in 1989 to link the two works for violin and orchestra. Having done so, its a pity that Naxos didnt place the pieces in the composers preferred order of PartitaInterludeChain 2: but this is scarcely a major drawback. |
||||
As soloist, Krzysztof Bakowski is several degrees less charismatic than Anne-Sophie Mutter, in whose hands the music sparkles and ruminates to maximum effect. The DG recording also has greater warmth. Indeed, the rather dry quality of the Naxos recording is evident throughout, and helps to make Funeral Music seem more than usually dour. The contrast between the Naxos sound and the far more spacious acoustic which Sony provide for Esa-Pekka Salonens version of the symphony is also striking. In places the sheer immediacy of Naxoss restricted perspective pays dividends, and Antoni Wits shaping of the symphonys satisfyingly substantial structure is well conceived, even if the orchestral playing is less polished, less richly nourished, than that emanating from Los Angeles. |
||||
Overall the Sony sound is less one-dimensional than the Naxos, and yet its sheer refinement serves to deprive this score of some of its dramatic immediacy. The field remains open for other interpretations, and other recordings, to strike a better balance. |
||||
AW |
||||