| Honegger [Symphony] Symphonies No.
1 in C, H75 a; No. 2, H153
b; No. 3, Liturgique, H186 c;
No. 4 in A, Deliciae basiliensis, H191 b; No. 5 in D, Di
tre re, H202 c. Pacific 231, H53 a. Rugby, H67 a.
Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra / Charles Dutoit. |
|
|
| Teldec Ultima (Budget price) (CD) 3984-21340-2
(two discs: 141 minutes: DDD). Items marked a from NUM75254 (4/86), b NUM75259 (5/86), c
ECD88045 (recorded 1982). |
|
|
| Teldec Ultima (Budget price) (CD) 3984-21090-2
(two discs: 119 minutes: DDD). Items marked a from ECD88225 (6/87), b ECD88226 (6/87). |
|
|
| Roussel selected comparison: |
|
|
| French Radio PO, Janowski (6/96) (RCA) 09026
62511-2 |
|
In his Quarterly retrospect in August
1996, RL pointed out that while Bartok has always had a following among the wider
musical public, for some reason Roussel never has. Perhaps the answer lies in Basil
Deanes assessment in Grove that Roussels style was essentially an
eclectic one, based on personal manipulation of traditional elements. Bartoks
mature style was never essentially eclectic. But listening through
Roussels fine symphony cycle is to witness, for the most part, a genuine symphonist
at work. There is a fascinating progression and shift of references, from the
late-romantic time-scale in the first two symphonies Debussy and dIndy in the
pre-war Firsts pictorialism, early Prokofiev in the Seconds brooding and
eruptive post-war blues (blatantly borrowed Prokofievian motor-rhythmic style in evidence
near the end of its finale) to the crystallization of the mature Roussel 1930s
style in the more neo-classical concision of the last two symphonies (a manner that does
not prevent heartfelt expression, glorious melodies and sweeping gestures in both
symphonies slow movements). Roussel himself declared that his music was destined for
very rare listeners, yet there are no barriers to its ready appreciation, once
one has accepted that, unlike Bartok, he wasnt a true original.
Since this Dutoit Roussel cycle first appeared,
we have had another from Marek Janowski, which I underrated in my original review,
overlooking his very considerable achievements in the First and Second Symphonies. Heard
after Dutoit, Janowski brings an extra dimension to these two symphonies, allowing himself
more freedom and space for evocative shaping and shading (the forces of darkness in the
Second are more powerfully drawn). And adding positively to this are the deeper
perspectives of Janowskis RCA recordings. But turn to the Third and Fourth, and it
is Dutoit and his players who more consistently deliver the essential incisive
accentuation, and whose engineers relay tone and detail with a more immediately engaging
bolder projection and lively presence. So, six of one and half a dozen of the other,
though the Dutoit set is half the price of the Janowski.
There is every reason to regard Honeggers
five symphonies, as a cycle, as important as Roussels. But although the composers
overlapped, were both pupils of dIndy, and may have both learned too much from 1920s
Stravinsky and Prokofiev, Honegger is very obviously next generation, musically, and in
his response to not one, but two world wars. The music is harmonically much more daring
(plenty of writing in two keys at once), dealing in sometimes consecutive, at others
simultaneous, but always very bold and often very moving contrasts gesturally
graphic grim realities and possible deliverance or almost escapism all within a
neo-classical framework. Dutoit is perhaps rather better at the often seraphic beauty of
the deliverance and escapism for example, the haven of the Fourth Symphony is the
single most successful performance here than he is with the musics muscular
driving force and dark power. Nevertheless his cycle is a considerable achievement, and
the Munich recordings, though not as vividly present as some, are faultlessly balanced and
satisfyingly natural. In short, at the price, an attractive starting-point for the
Honegger symphonies. Minimal insert-notes are a feature of these Ultima reissues.
JS