GramoFile on the Web
Debussy La mer. [Nocturne] Nocturnes a. a Ambrosian Chorus; London Symphony Orchestra / Andre Previn.
HMV digital (Full price) (LP) ASD1436321 (Cassette) TC-ASD1436324.
Selected comparisons
BPO, Karajan (3/65) (10/79R) 2542 116
Concertgebouw, Haitink (4/78) (10/81R) 9500 359
Concertgebouw, Haitink (11/80) (10/81R) 9500 674
Boston SO, C. Davis (7/83) 6514 260.

Save the reservations, such as they are, for later; let me say at the outset that these performances are by no means cast in the shade even by the exceptionally distinguished list of selected comparisons above. I must confess that I had not expected them to be quite so good. I do not recall having heard Previn conduct Debussy before, and his recording of the Images four or five years ago was not especially well received as a performance (HMV ASD3804, 12/79; CD EMI CDC 7 47001 2, 2/84). Like Davis's though, but in a totally different way, they have the ability to make one think about these much-recorded works afresh. I suppose I had thought that the centre of Debussy's orchestra in both pieces is the woodwind and high strings, until Davis's bracing readings, of La mer especially, revealed how much of both the light and the weight of that music can be seen to be conveyed by the brass. Where Davis's Nocturnes are mistily northern and his La mer is the Baltic, Previn moves the music much closer to the Mediterranean with his warm and passionate, never histrionic but perhaps Latin concentration on the strings. They dominate the climaxes, making them grand and massive where Davis's were rather coldly gleaming, but one remembers from Previn's readings less the climaxes, splendid though they are, than the many passages of divided string writing. The delicate gradations of string sonority not long after the opening of the first nocturne for example, are both velvety and grainy—a lovely sound, and with not a trace of indulgent swooping to it; at this point both Davis and Haitink (also Philips) are cooler and more ethereal. The melody for violas and cellos at fig. 27 of "Jeux de vagues" (La mer) is another characteristic moment: more richly eloquent than Haitink, and far more so than Davis, who is more concerned with athletic impetus in this movement. The contrast is most noticeable, of course, in the third nocturne, "Sir0enes", where no conductor on record approaches Davis's hieratic mystery. Previn sees the music as almost voluptuously sensual, hardly remote at all: his sirens inhabit a warm, sunlit ocean, and they are by no means unapproachable.

My reservations concern matters that are perhaps part and parcel of Previn's overtly emotional way with music: a shortage of true pianissimo (although the exquisite opening of the first nocturne shows that it can be achieved, elsewhere Debussy's magical near-silences are just a decibel above the mystery-threshold); a slight tendency to bring forward the woodwind, as though to project them above those finely-judged string textures; and a feeling that, commendably wide though the dynamic range is, its peaks are steeper than its troughs—such markings as subito pp or the transition sfp go for less than they could. But they are performances that I would gladly live with, especially if I could have Haitink's (for his greater delicacy of detail and closer attention to dynamic gradations) and Davis's (for his compelling vision of Debussy's ocean as cliff-girt and lit by a cold sun) as well. Of the comparisons, Previn's La mer most closely resembles Karajan's (DG), which is even more finely played but rather less closely recorded; it has, too, the occasional moment of exaggeration, the avoidance of which in such an expansive reading is not the least of Previn's achievements.
MEO