|
...and what about the WOW factor?
There is first light and there is first light.
It didn’t take me long to have a first glance through the binoscope after I received Mike’s optics.
The first thing I noted at 'first light' was that the background sky was significantly darker.
With binocular vision a general improvement of the signal to noise ratio in the images is claimed.
Noise that with one eye may still be registered as a real signal is not anymore registered as such while looking with two eyes.
Consequently the images in a binoscope gain in contrast and it looks as if the background has become significantly darker.
Even in my heavily light-polluted hometown the background was significantly darker!
Star images were tack sharp, but this is more of a compliment to Mike Lockwood!
But I also noted that the starfields were ‘calmer’ or more stable, this by lack of better words.
Possibly due to a lack of eye strain, not having to keep one eye shut all the time.
Whatever reason, the initial observations gave me a nice indication of what to expect of 'first light' under a dark sky in France.
What would the WOW factor be that experienced observers claim for observing with a binoscope....?
What follows is an extract of some field notes I scribbled down on specific objects.
For comparisons I had the 16 inch f/4.5 mono-telescope set up as well.
Photo's (I'd say: of course) are not mine, but come from the website the Sloan Digitized Sky Survey.
M13/ NGC 6207
First light with the binoscope under a dark sky in the Morvan.
M13 is VERY impressive and floats like an island in a very dark sky!
A bright beacon that just escapes on all sites from the oculars.
Compared with the 16 inch telescope the normal ‘flat’ image appears to become ‘wobbly’,
there is a distinct 3-D illusion.
The large M13 nucleus actually lies ON a large flat halo of razor sharp stars,
from which streams of stars escape, floating away into the inkblack space.
Only now you understand where he word GLOBULAR comes from!
This you can't see on photo's, such as the one below of M13.
In fact, I find the visual observation of this globular MUCH MUCH nicer and more appealing.
What happens when you close one eye, thus creating a mono-telescope again?
You don't see much less all of a sudden, but the artificial 3-D feeling is gone instantaneously.
I tested this on a number of objects and noted the same result.
And with low power (61 x; 27 mm Panoptics) you can see NGC 6207 in the same view (upper left in the picture).
A small, but bright galaxy.
What always was called a stellar nucleus now becomes really stellar.
A very concentrated light point.
Surrounded by a clear halo.
For the first time I note the beautiful shape of the galaxy.
Elongated and partly seen on the side like a miniature M31.
At 235 x, I clearly see a mottled appearance with differences in brightness are seen in the halo.
Definitely much more than the previous amorphous faint spot of light.
M31
And then the dark lanes!! M31, in the direction of M110.
With the 27 mm Panoptics (1.1º true field) the nuclei of M31, M32 and M110 are caught in one view.
M32 has a stellar nucleus, but now for real!
It is indeed almost a star!
The two broken oval lines are a rough indication what I could see before with the 16 and 20 inch telescopes versus the binoscoop.
The most prominent dark lane in M31 just jumps from the eyepieces,
but also the second system of lanes is clearly visible.
This is because the enormous halo is so obvious.
It extends beyond M32.
The picture below is obviously much more detailed than what can be seen visually.
But, we're getting there.....
The halo can’t be seen in its totality, but scanning through the large field is some experience as well.
The halo is very faint and I have never seen it this transparent with any mono-telescope.
With scanning the halo suddenly drops away,
the border between dark and faint light is sharp en very clear to see.
This was definitely a WOW factor!
M51
Also M51 gives an enormously detailed image.
At 165 x the arms are completely separated.
There is not so much an increase in brightness of the arms though.
No, it appears as if the areas between the arms have become darker!
The already mentioned increase in contrast with the binoscope has its effect within the spiral arms themselves!
M51 becomes more of an atom model than the structured "blur" with differences in brightness.
The sharpness is amazing.
And here as well: when I look with one eye only, this effect is gone instanteneously.
Yes, the spiral structure is still there, but gone is the blackness between the arms.
NGC 6992/6995
The Veil nebula.
This is extremely impressive, particularly the head of NGC 6992 (NGC 6995), is amazingly beautiful:
long feathers of light standing out squarely on the main part of the nebula.
Contrast-rich filaments of light run through the view, clouds of light, smoke rings, all razor sharp.
This I never saw before: in the 16 inch telescope for instance I now see much less of these details.
It is hard to get enough of this!
M27
The Dumbbell nebula.
Maybe the most appealing example.
Whereas the image in the 16 inch telescope is certainly very beautiful, bright and full of contrast,
the image in the binsocope is much sharper and shows even more contrast.
In the binoscope the halter itself stands out very sharp and the 'side-lobs' are brighter than in the 16 inch telescope.
What strikes with the binoscope is the sharpness of the borders between light and dark.
The field of view is almost filled (at 165 x) with the nebula.
Multiple stars are seen with more ease.
The nebula shows many details and large irregularities in brightness.
This is beautiful and WOW!
At the left is a beautiful drawing of Michiel Boltjes, based on obsrevation with a 20 inch mono-telescope.
At the right is my drawing, based on observations with the binoscope.
The drawing of Michiel Boltjes is very similar of what I can see with my 16 inch telescope.
NGC 2392
The Eskimo planetaire nebula in Gemini.
I observed it extensively at ~275 x with both the binoscope and the 16 inch telescope.
In either case the inner, somewhat irregular, bright ring was very well visible.
This ring is detached from the central star and there is a dark zone in between.
And between the first, bright ring and the outer layers of the nebula is another dark zone.
This dark zone is much better pronounced in the binoscope.
Also the inner, bright ring is better defined and sharper.
The differences are most apparent without filter.
With the binoscope the central star, the bright, innder ring,
the dark zones and the outer layers are all better defined.
With the 16 inch telescope the inner ring is fused almost seamless to the diffuse outer layer.
The differences are subtle, but very apparent when observed in the similar setting with the 16 inch telescope or binoscope.
At the left is a beautiful drawing from Kurt Christiaens, based on observations with a 16 inch telescope.
At the right my impression, based on observations with the binoscope.
The drawing from Kurt Christiaens matches closely what I see through my 16 inch telescope.
|